3. Academy model and branding
A Strong Case for Academies
Upon further examination, we can grasp the considerable impact this has on the academy model. Specifically, the quality level attributed to the academy tends to be transferred to the work of individual artists, regardless of the actual technical quality of the procedures or the photo representations of those results. This phenomenon strongly advocates for academies with significant reach and recognition that are linked to higher quality standards. Essentially, academies can assert that students will find it easier to attract clients using the academy's branding. This claim isn't mere speculation; it's backed by actual observations.
The Potential Caveats of a Hierarchical System
This leads us to another important point: many academies have begun implementing multi-tiered systems for their students, and there's sound reasoning behind it. If an academy offers only one or too few levels, it risks a "cannibalization of quality." Within each level, there is a phenomenon where 15-25% of the artists consistently elevate the quality of work in that bracket. These artists often have a broader influence in shaping public opinion, impacting the entire level's perception. This allows artists who have recently moved up to that level or those whose work is of lower quality to benefit from the enhanced perception and receive similar treatment from prospective clients.
Though this might seem a disadvantage, it's part of the academy model's inherent structure. Therefore, it's not necessarily a negative phenomenon. The key lies in carefully calibrating the number of levels, the size of each bracket, and the steep progression to the next level to suit the pool of artists within the academy. If the bracket becomes too large, "free riders" may begin to negatively impact overall quality. Conversely, managing such an array of levels becomes increasingly challenging if it's too tiny.
The Illusion of "No-Brand" in the Brow Business
In the realm of brow services, you might come across artists who haven't aligned themselves with a prominent brow academy or brand. However, this doesn't mean they operate as a "no-brand" or white-label service. In most cases, these artists still possess a form of branding: their personal brand, usually their name or artist alias.
So, what does this mean for customer acquisition? Essentially, an artist with no affiliation to a recognized brand has fewer persuasive tools at her disposal to convince potential clients of the quality of her work. Should she aim to compete with artists who have cultivated personal solid brands—brands that clients associate with high-quality service—relying solely on the quality of her work won't suffice.
Optimal Scenario for Practical Implementation
Investing in brand development ranks among the most costly elements in the brow business, a trend observed across various industries. In this light, aligning oneself with a well-established brand offers a robust platform for further personal brand development. This two-pronged approach saves time and resources and enhances your credibility and appeal to prospective clients.
Forming a Symbiotic Relationship with an Academy
Associating oneself with an academy is neither inherently "bad" nor "limiting." The essence of the relationship lies in mutual benefit. If the artist produces high-quality work, this elevates the prestige of the particular level they're placed in within the academy. The crucial aspect here is clarity— the artist must understand how, when, and under what conditions they can advance to the next tier.
Most separations between artists and academies can be traced back to a mismatch between the artist's skills and their level within the academy. In straightforward terms, if the artist outgrows their current tier and the academy fails to provide a clear pathway to the next level, the model becomes less effective for that artist.
In the Final Analysis, Academies Serve as a Springboard for Personal Branding
A point that often escapes artists is that progression within an academy, in the long run, serves chiefly as a platform for personal brand development. This is unless, of course, the artist is a shareholder in the academy. Many of our articles have discussed the critical nature of personal branding. As one seasoned artist aptly said: "In the end game, my personal reputation as an artist is all that really counts."
So, the pivotal question to ponder is, "What do I truly own?" If the academy's trademark belongs to another entity, then your business valuations under that banner are inherently weak. To put it plainly, unless you hold shares in the academy, the primary asset you derive from this relationship is a boost to your personal brand, effective for the duration of your association with the academy.